Danny Rivera Pediatric Cough Shadow Health Assessment

Danny Rivera Pediatric Cough Shadow Health Assessment

Danny Rivera Pediatric Cough Shadow Health Assessment

Your Results

Danny Rivera Pediatric Cough Shadow Health Assessment

 Lab Pass

Experience Overview

 SCORE 100% ON YOUR SHADOW HEALTH ASSESSMENT,

CHAT US, WE’LL GUIDE YOU ON HOW TO PLACE YOUR ORDER

Patient: Danny Rivera

Pediatric Assignment, Assignment Icon

Digital Clinical Experience Score

100%

This score measures your performance on the Student Performance Index in relation to other students in comparable academic programs. Your instructor has chosen to scale your Student Performance Index score so that the average score on the index is a 80.0%. This score may not be your final grade if your instructor chooses to include additional components, such as documentation or time spent. Danny Rivera Pediatric Cough Shadow Health Assessment.

Student Performance Index

35.4

out of

38

Proficiency Level:

Proficient
Students rated as “proficient” demonstrate an entry-level expertise in advanced practice competencies and clinical reasoning skills. In comparable programs, the top 25% of students perform at the level of a proficient practitioner.

Subjective Data Collection

20

out of

20

Objective Data Collection

12.4

out of

13

Education and Empathy

3

out of

5

Time

91 minutes total spent in assignment

Interaction with patient

74 minutes

Post-exam activities

17 minutes

Introduction and Pre-brief

Daniel “Danny” Rivera is an 8-year-old boy brought to the clinic by a family member for a cough. It is important for you to determine whether or not Danny is in distress, explore the underlying cause of his cough, and look for related symptoms in other body systems. Ask about a variety of psychosocial factors related to home life, such as second-hand smoke exposure. Be sure to observe non-verbal cues as Danny presents with intermittent coughing and visible breathing difficulty. This case study will challenge you to differentiate his presenting symptoms and carefully listen as you auscultate his lungs. You will have the opportunity to also physically examine his eyes, ears, nose, and throat and document your findings using appropriate professional medical terminology. Apply the supportive information learned in the respiratory concept lab to your critical thinking process in this case study.

Tips and Tricks

Upon physical exam, be sure to note clues to specific conditions and pathology. For example, “cobblestoning” is pathognomonic for Allergic Rhinitis. Conversely, understand that an erythemic tympanic membrane is not necessarily pathognomonic for Otitis Media.

You will utilize specific assessment tools with your clinical practice. Be sure you know how to apply and interpret the Centor assessment criteria. The Centor criteria are a set of criteria which may be used to identify the likelihood of a bacterial infection in patients complaining of a sore throat. Danny Rivera Pediatric Cough Shadow Health Assessment.

Most cough suppressant preparations are marketed as mixtures of dextromethorphan or codeine with antihistamines, decongestants, expectorants, and/or antipyretics. Some nonprescription preparations substitute diphenhydramine or eucalyptus oil in place of codeine or dextromethorphan. Prescription medications may substitute other narcotic agents (hydrocodone or hydromorphone) for codeine and may be more addictive than codeine.

Purposes

The purposes of the Shadow Health Physical Assessment Assignments are to: (a) increase knowledge and understanding of advanced practice physical assessment skills and techniques, (b) conduct focused and comprehensive histories and physical assessments for various patient populations, (c) adapt or modify your physical assessment skills and techniques to suit the individual needs of the patient, (d) apply assessment skills and techniques to gather subjective and objective data, (e) differentiate normal from abnormal physical examination findings, (f) summarize, organize, and appropriately document findings using correct professional terminology, (g) practice developing primary and differential diagnoses, (h) practice creating treatment plans which include diagnostics, medication, education, consultation/referral, and follow-up planning; and (i) analyze and reflect on own performance to gain insight and foster knowledge.

Due Date

Friday 11:59 PM MT at the end of each respective week.

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Danny Rivera Pediatric Cough Shadow Health Assessment,

In the event of an emergency that prevents timely submission of an assignment, students may petition their instructor for a waiver of the late submission grade reduction. The instructor will review the student’s rationale for the request and make a determination based on the merits of the student’s appeal. Consideration of the student’s total course performance to date will be a contributing factor in the determination. Students should continue to attend class, actively participate, and complete other assignments while the appeal is pending.

Total Points Possible: 75 Points

Assignment

Step One: Complete Respiratory Assignment

Step Two: Document your findings on the Fillable Soap Note Template or the Printable Soap Note.

Step Three:  Upload the Lab Pass and completed SOAP Note as separate documents to the same assignment tab in the gradebook.

Requirements

NOTE: Before initiating any activity in Shadow Health, complete the required course weekly readings and lessons as well as review the introduction and pre-brief.

  1. Complete the Shadow Health Concept Lab (Weeks 2, 4, and 5) prior to beginning the graded assignment.
  2. Gather subjective and objective data by completing a focused, detailed health history and physical examination for each physical assessment assignment.
  3. Critically appraise the findings as normal or abnormal.
  4. Complete the post activity assessment questions for each assignment . Danny Rivera Pediatric Cough Shadow Health Assessment
  5. Complete all reflection questions following each physical assessment assignment.
  6. Digital Clinical Experience (DCE) scores do not round up. For example, a DCE score of 92.99 is a 92, not a 93.
  7. You have a maximum of two (2) attempts per Shadow Health assignment to improve your performance. However, you may elect not to repeat any assignment. NOTE: If you repeat an attempt, ONLY the second attempt will be graded, regardless of the DCE score. Please refer to the grading rubric categories for details.
  8. Download the Lab Pass for the final attempt on the assignment.

On the Canvas Platform:

  1. Summarize, organize, and appropriately document findings using correct professional terminology on the SOAP Note Template.
  2. Identify three (3) differential diagnoses and provide ICD-10 codes and pertinent positive and negative findings for each diagnosis.
  3. Create a comprehensive treatment plan for each assignment. Must address the following components: Diagnostics, Medication, Education, Referral/Consultation, and Follow-up planning. If no interventions for one or more component, document “none at this time” but do not skip over the component.
  4. Provide rationales and citations for diagnoses and interventions.
  5. Include at least one scholarly source to support diagnoses and treatment interventions with rationales and references on the SOAP note. Only scholarly sources are acceptable for citation and reference in this course. These include peer-reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. The textbooks and lessons are NOT considered to be outside scholarly sources. For the threaded discussions and reflection posts, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer-reviewed nursing journal.  You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available databases for a peer-reviewed journal article.  The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs.  These websites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality.  For example, the American Heart Association is a .com site with scholarship and quality. Each student is responsible for determining the scholarship and quality of any .com site.  Ask your instructor before using any site if you are unsure. Points will be deducted from the rubric if the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality. Current outside scholarly sources must be published with the last 5 years.  Instructor permission must be obtained BEFORE the assignment is due if using a source that is older than 5 years.
  6. Upload the Lab Pass to the appropriate assignment area in Canvas Grades

 SCORE 100% ON YOUR SHADOW HEALTH ASSESSMENT,  CONTACT US

Shadow Health Grading Rubric

Portions of the rubric are designated with a ***. The following explains those portions of the rubric:

Digital Clinical Experience (DCE) Score is automatically translated by Shadow Health based on individual student performance and reflects how student work compares to their peer learners across the country for a particular assignment. The DCE Score is a fair assessment of effort, and therefore is appropriate for use when grading assignments.

**Scholarly Sources: Only scholarly sources are acceptable for citation and reference in this course. These include peer-reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. The textbooks and lessons are NOT considered to be outside scholarly sources. For the threaded discussions and reflection posts, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer-reviewed nursing journal.  You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available databases for a peer-reviewed journal article.  The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs.  These websites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality.  For example, the American Heart Association is a .com site with scholarship and quality. Each student is responsible for determining the scholarship and quality of any .com site.  Ask your instructor before using any site if you are unsure. Points will be deducted from the rubric if the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality. Current outside scholarly sources must be published with the last 5 years.  Instructor permission must be obtained BEFORE the assignment is due if using a source that is older than 5 years.

***Components of a treatment plan include diagnosticsmedicationeducationconsultation/referral, and follow-up planning

****Insight refers to the capacity to gain an accurate and deep intuitive understanding of a concept or thing. For example, one might demonstrate insight by relating a concept to a personal or meaningful experience.

ASSIGNMENT CONTENT
Category Points % Description
Health History Communication, Education, Empathy, and Summary

(DCE Score or transcript)

 

15 20% The Digital Clinical Experience (DCE)Score is automatically translates by Shadow Health based on individual student performance and reflects how student work with data collection, health history communication, education, empathy, and summarization compares to peer learners across the country for a particular assignment. The DCE Score is a fair assessment of effort, and therefore is appropriate for use when grading assignments. Occasionally, performance transcripts may be reviewed for secondary support.
Assessment, Documentation, Treatment Plan, and Scholarly Sources

Danny Rivera Pediatric Cough Shadow Health Assessment

35 47% This category is evaluated on the quality of student’s ability to: Identify pertinent normal and abnormal findings for the assignment, utilize professional terminology, provide comprehensive and detailed subjective and objective findings, identify differential diagnoses, and create a comprehensive treatment plan. Includeat least one appropriate EBP scholarly source and use the SOAP Note format template to document all findings.

 

Self-Reflection 15 20% Self-reflection posts must demonstrate the student’s own perspective. The quality of this criterion is based upon responding to all the reflection questions; providing responses that are substantive (add importance, meaningfulness, and relevance to the post); demonstrate analysis of own performance; and demonstrate insight. Insight refers to the capacity to gain an accurate and deep intuitive understanding of a concept or thing. For example, one might demonstrate insight by relating a concept to a personal or meaningful experience.Reflection post responses should vary from SH assignment to assignment. Danny Rivera Pediatric Cough Shadow Health Assessment

 

65 87% Total CONTENT Points= 65
ASSIGNMENT FORMAT
Category Points % Description
Grammar, Spelling, Syntax, Mechanics and APA Format 10 13% Reflection post has minimal grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation and APA* errors. Direct quotes (if used) is limited to 1 short statement** which adds substantively to the post.

* APA style references and in text citations are required; however, there are no deductions for errors in indentation or spacing of references. All elements of the reference otherwise must be included. Danny Rivera Pediatric Cough Shadow Health Assessment.

**Direct quote should not to exceed 15 words & must add substantively to the assignment Danny Rivera Pediatric Cough Shadow Health Assessment.

10 100% Total FORMAT Points= 10
ASSIGNMENT TOTAL= 75 points

Rubric

NR509 Weeks 2-6 Shadow Health Assignment_Sept19 (5)

NR509 Weeks 2-6 Shadow Health Assignment_Sept19 (5)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Content Possible Points = 65 Points

Criterion 1

Health History Communication, Education, Empathy, and Summary

(DCE Score or Transcript)

15.0 pts

Excellent

DCE Score > 93

14.0 pts

V. Good

DCE Score 86-92

12.0 pts

Satisfactory

DCE Score 80-85

8.0 pts

Needs Improvement

DCE Score < 79

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No Assignment

15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCriterion 2 Assessment, Documentation, Treatment Plan, and Scholarly Sources

Must demonstrate the following elements:

Identified all pertinent normal and abnormal findings;

Used professional terminology;

Subjective and objective documentation was detailed and comprehensive;

Used the SOAP Note Format template for documentation;

Identified three (3) differential diagnoses with ICD-10 codes and pertinent positive/negative findings;

Addressed each of the following on the treatment plan: Diagnostics, Medication, Education, Referral/Consultation, and Follow-up Planning;

Interventions are detailed and appropriate for the focused assignment;

Provided at least one appropriate EBP scholar source Danny Rivera Pediatric Cough Shadow Health Assessment

(8 Required Elements)

35.0 pts

Excellent

Demonstrated all elements for this Criterion

32.0 pts

V. Good

Missing 1 element for this Criterion

29.0 pts

Satisfactory

Missing 2 or 3 elements for this Criterion

18.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Missing 4 or 5 elements on for this Criterion

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Missing 6 or more elements for the criterion Or No Assignment

35.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCriterion 3 Self-Reflection

Must demonstrate the following elements:

Written from the student’s own perspective;

Responded to all the reflection questions;

Responses were each substantive (added importance, meaningfulness, and relevance to the post);

Offer self-analysis of performance and insight;

Reflection post responses should vary from SH assignment to assignment.

(5 Required Elements)

15.0 pts

Excellent

Demonstrated all elements for this Criterion

14.0 pts

V. Good

Missing 1 element for this Criterion

12.0 pts

Satisfactory

Missing 2 elements for this Criterion

8.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Missing 3 elements for this Criterion

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Missing 4 or more elements for the criterion Or No Assignment

15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Format Possible Points = 10 Points

Format Criterion 1

Grammar, Spelling, Syntax, Mechanics and APA Format

10.0 pts

Excellent

0-1 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, mechanics, or APA format

9.0 pts

V. Good

2-3 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, mechanics, or APA format

8.0 pts

Satisfactory

4-5 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, mechanics, or APA format

5.0 pts

Needs Improvement

6-7 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, mechanics, or APA format

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory

8 or more errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, mechanics, or APA format Or No assignment

10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Penalty Deductions

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.

0.0 pts

Minus Points

0.0 pts

Minus Points

0.0 pts
Total Points: 75.0 Danny Rivera Pediatric Cough Shadow Health Assessment

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more