Comparison of Research Articles Rubric
| 1 Unsatisfactory 59.00% | 2 Less Than Satisfactory 65.00% | 3 Satisfactory 75.00% | 4 Good 85.00% | 5 Excellent 100.00% | ||
| 70.0 %Content | ||||||
| 10.0 %Article Comparison Table | Not included. | The Article Comparison Table is attached, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. | The Article Comparison Table is attached, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. | The Article Comparison Table is attached and all required information is incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support. | The Article Comparison Table is attached and all required information is incorporated comprehensively. The submission further includes analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. | |
| 10.0 %Summary Of The Chosen Topic With Rationale | Not included. | A summary of the chosen topic with rationale is present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. | A summary of the chosen topic with rationale is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. | A summary of the chosen topic with rationale is present and incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support. | A summary of the chosen topic with rationale is present and comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. | |
| 10.0 %Explanation Of The Significance Of The Two Research Studies To Health Care Delivery In The United States. | Not included. | An explanation of the significance of the two research studies to health care delivery in the United States is present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. | An explanation of the significance of the two research studies to health care delivery in the United States is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. | An explanation of the significance of the two research studies to health care delivery in the United States is present and incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support. | An explanation of the significance of the two research studies to health care delivery in the United States is present and comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. | |
| 10.0 %Summary Of The Chosen Topic With Rationale. | Not included. | A summary of the chosen topic with rationale is present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. | A summary of the chosen topic with rationale is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. | A summary of the chosen topic with rationale is present and incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support. | A summary of the chosen topic with rationale is present and comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. | |
| 10.0 %Identification Of Potential Environments Within Health Care Delivery Appropriate To Research And Data Monitoring. | Not included. | Identification of potential environments within health care delivery appropriate to research and data monitoring is present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. | Identification of potential environments within health care delivery appropriate to research and data monitoring is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. | Identification of potential environments within health care delivery appropriate to research and data monitoring is present and incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support. | Identification of potential environments within health care delivery appropriate to research and data monitoring is present and comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. | |
| 10.0 %Assessment Of The Impact Of The Studies In Your Chosen Articles In Regards To Health Care Delivery, Incorporating And Expanding On The Information Provided In The Article Analysis Table. | Not included. | An assessment of the impact of the studies in your chosen articles in regards to health care delivery, incorporating and expanding on the information provided in the Article Analysis Table is present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. | An assessment of the impact of the studies in your chosen articles in regards to health care delivery, incorporating and expanding on the information provided in the Article Analysis Table is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. | An assessment of the impact of the studies in your chosen articles in regards to health care delivery, incorporating and expanding on the information provided in the Article Analysis Table is present and incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support. | An assessment of the impact of the studies in your chosen articles in regards to health care delivery, incorporating and expanding on the information provided in the Article Analysis Table is present and comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. | |
| 10.0 %Assessment Of The Role The Allied Health Professional Does, Or Could, Play, In Research And Data Monitoring Of Health Care Delivery In The United States. | Not included. | An assessment of the role the allied health professional does, or could, play, in research and data monitoring of health care delivery in the United States is present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. | An assessment of the role the allied health professional does, or could, play, in research and data monitoring of health care delivery in the United States is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. | An assessment of the role the allied health professional does, or could, play, in research and data monitoring of health care delivery in the United States is present and incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support. | An assessment of the role the allied health professional does, or could, play, in research and data monitoring of health care delivery in the United States is present and comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. | |
| 20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness | ||||||
| 7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | |
| 20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness | ||||||
| 8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. | |
| 20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness | ||||||
| 5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | |
| 10.0 %Format | ||||||
| 5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. | |
| 5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more