Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness
Introduction
The organizational culture survey tool of choice for the purpose of assessing the readiness of Memorial Regional Hospital in Hollywood Florida for the implementation of Evidence Based Practice is Organization Culture and Readiness for System-Wide Integration of EBP Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness. This survey tool adequately explores the factors that influence or hinder organizations from adopting EBP including the changes that should be expected. Therefore, this tool will be the most appropriate to investigate, evaluate and identify the readiness of Memorial Regional Hospital in Hollywood Florida to take part in evidence based practice.
Level of Organizational Readiness
` Based on the findings of the evaluation, it was evident that the organization is ready to take part in evidence-based practice. There is passion and commitment among nurses who form a major part of the health workforce in the organization and this will serve as a drive to conduct further research to improve health outcomes. Physicians are self-drive, dedicated and fully collaborate with nurses in providing care to patients. This is indicative that, in conducting and implementing evidence based practice, there will be maximum inter-professional collaboration which increases the chances of success and quality care (Melynyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2015). Memorial Regional Hospital has a department that conducts research which is linked with the research centers at the state and national levels. Nurses are actively involved in conducting research in this department and numerous journals on different research topics have so far been published Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness. The presence of a library supports the availability of resources for conducting research in various topics.
Barriers to Implementing EBP
There are certain human and organizational factors which are potential barriers to implementing EBP in Memorial Regional Hospital. They include: time, tight work schedules and inadequate experience in EBP among staff members. Since the organization receives an influx of patients, it is often busy and most nurses are always on tight work schedules which limit their availability to adequately participate in EBP. This also explains most nurses have inadequate experience with EBP Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness.
Facilitators to Implementing EBP
Recently, there has been a significant increase in the number of geriatric patients suffering from pneumonia admitted to the hospital to receive care. This has raised concerns from healthcare providers and the hospital administration on the need to find and implement preventive measures Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness. The leadership of Memorial Regional Hospital believes and supports that EBP is the only alternative to achieving quality and improved health outcomes (Yano, 2014). It is ready to support the full adoption and implementation of EBP by providing financial and non-financial resources.
References
Melynyk, B. & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2015). Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare. A guide to best practice (3rd ed.). China: Wolters Kluwer Health.
Yano, E. M. (2014). The role of organizational research in implementing evidence-based practice: QUERI Series. Implementation Science, 3(1), 1 Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness.
Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment
Details:
Before making a case for an evidence-based project, it is essential to understand the culture of the organization in order to begin assessing its readiness for EBP implementation. Select an appropriate organizational culture survey tool and use this instrument to assess the organization’s readiness.
The organization is Memorial Regional Hospital in Hollywood Florida
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
RUBRICS
Top of FormEvidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%2 Less than Satisfactory 80.00%3 Satisfactory 88.00%4 Good 92.00%5 Excellent 100.00% 100.0 %Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness 100.0 %Describe the results from the organizational culture survey you selected, addressing the readiness level of your organization. Provide an analysis of any possible project barriers and facilitators, and describe how to integrate clinical inquiry into your organization.The survey results are listed without an in-depth explanation. Analysis of the project barriers and facilitators is not outlined or is outlined poorly. Clinical inquiry is defined and/or broad statements are made about it, but the individual organization being assessed is not specifically addressed. Inaccurate comprehension of material is revealed, as is the lack of ability to apply information. Subject matter is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section A: Organizational Culture and ReadinessThe survey results are listed without an in-depth explanation. The project barriers and facilitators are ignored or superficially evaluated. Unwarranted conclusions are drawn. Clinical inquiry is defined and/or broad statements are made about it, but the individual organization being assessed is not specifically addressed. A lack of comprehension is displayed, but there is an attempt to apply information. There is weak, marginal coverage of subject matter with large gaps in presentation. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.A basic survey overview is provided, but any rationale, details, and/or examples are minimally included. A surface level of evaluation of the possible project barriers and facilitators is conducted. Very narrow focus is provided. Claims and ideas of the criteria are supported but not developed in-depth. How to integrate a basic idea of clinical inquiry into the organization is explained but does not specifically address the individual organization being assessed. Comprehension of the material is exhibited and there is clearly an attempt to integrate and apply information. All subject matter is covered in minimal quantity and quality. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.Information in relation to the survey categories which scored high and low on the survey is provided. The rationale for the scores, including details and/or examples, is stated. Analysis on the project barriers and facilitators is direct, competent, and appropriately aligned to the survey. How to integrate a basic idea of clinical inquiry into the organization is explained, and strategies that broadly encompass many issues of concern are provided. Integrative and accurate comprehension is demonstrated and information is applied as appropriate. There is comprehensive coverage of subject matter. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.Detailed information in relation to the survey categories that scored high and low on the survey is provided. The rationale for the scores, including details and/or examples, is provided. The major project barriers and facilitators are thoughtfully analyzed and evaluated. Warranted conclusions are drawn. An informed position on how to integrate clinical inquiry into the organization is developed and explained, providing strategies which align to the weaker areas of the organization. Clarity and specificity of comprehension are demonstrated, and all relevant information is synthesized. Coverage extends beyond what is needed to support subject matter. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 100 %Total Weightage Bottom of Form Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness |
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more